Ideologues like you have been saying that kind of nonsense for decades. Just like Christianity is about to disappear, right?

Hilton Kramer is writing about Stalinists and their mind games. But his words could serve equally well for VendicarDecarian0 and his ilk:

It is in the nature of Stalinism for its adherents to make a certain kind of lying—and not only to others, but first of all to themselves—a fundamental part of their lives. It is always a mistake to assume that Stalinists do not know the truth about the political reality they espouse. If they don’t know the truth (or all of it) one day, they know it the next, and it makes absolutely no difference to them politically For their loyalty is to something other than the truth. And no historical enormity is so great, no personal humiliation or betrayal so extreme, no crime so heinous that it cannot be assimilated into the “ideals” that govern the true Stalinist mind which is impervious alike to documentary evidence and moral discrimination.

Not for long.

Yup, everyone is in on it except you. It’s one giant global conspiracy against you.

And there it is! Real science vs junk science! At one time or another in human history, alchemy, astrology, drapetomania and phrenology were considered ‘real’. Global Warming will soon join them all on the trash heap of junk science!

Wrong https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/instant-noaa-forecast-fail/

Speaking of what are the 72 virgins the Koran promised suicide bombers and do women get the same 72 virgins as men?

Not a virgin

If not, why not? Discrimination?

Thanks for letting the USA know you are Islam.

Another lib indoctrinated by the bull $ hit from the lame media. Just for once try to think for yourself. Look at a temp graph over the last 1000 years. Ahh I’m wasting time talking to a moron.

Global temps have been rising since the end of the last Ice Age. Rising temps care what CAUSED the Ice Age to end.

So…?

How the hell would you know?

Push you fake data somewhere else please.

Who says its real, you or the liars that falsified it?

And your limited vocabulary

No need to use telekinesis. We can estimate your low IQ scores from the stupidity that you have demonstrated in your posts.

I can find 100 phony charts and graphs too

Typical Media Matters troll response. Nothing to contribute but slander and name calling.

I see you’re still slandering other peoples posts. Soros employees are so boring.

I don’t like the liar who calls himself VendicarDecarian0. The trick is to discover their lies, then shine a spotlight on them. They HATE being found out….

Everything you’ve said about Climatology has been a lie.

Did you know that:

Global Warming/Cooling/Climate Change ONLY exists in computer models?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought–computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html

Of the 150+ computer models, NOT A SINGLE ONE has successfully accounted for historical temperatures nor predicted future temperatures?
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/13975-climate-change-computer-models-fail-again-and-again-and-again

The only way to show global warming is to selectively change the RAW DATA?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/26/nasa-giss-caught-changing-past-data-again-violates-data-quality-act/

Someone who defends a fraud is himself a fraud.

You have no chance of making me believe your lie of Climate Change, nor can I change your mind, since you seem to not have one, so future replies will be treated like the trash they are. Dismissed!

Liar.. Liar… Pants on Fire…

the retards are the people who have scientists VOTE to decide if something is valid…what happened to the scientific method?

Yep, votes bought and paid for

An opinion piece in

IBD = Quack central.

in which the claim made doesn’t even begin to honestly begin to reflect what was said.

What was said.

“This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

The Lie told by IBD in the editorial.

“is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.”

The author of the liar in the IBD editorial is not named, but it is most certainly someone who works for the Fascist promoting CATO institute.

THEN YOU print the name of the person. Global warming is a hoax and if you don’t like the facts – tough

This means nothing. Where is it written that one years weather or temperatures are an indicator of anything? It is just another data point. People like to use the draught in California as evidence that global warming is occurring. Maybe so, maybe not. The areas of California now having a water crisis have been a desert environment long before California saw its first white person. They have simply ignored their predicament for decades upon decades until they cannot ignore it any longer. That has nothing to do with the climate and everything to do with stupidity and greed. Let’s stop subverting the scientific community into a left wing political community. It’s disgusting even by liberal standards.

I know of no scientists who aren’t Liberals. Certainly they all are in my department.

Education does that to a person.

Look at how all those data points form a line that is rapidly rising.

Another joke. Since we have records for only a few 100 years that’s complete Bul $ hit. Try going back to the medieval warming period where they raised grapes for wine in Scotland. Warmest month my ass.

The MWP wasn’t global.

How sad for you.

In Boston the records start in 1880. That is just over 100 years not a few 100 years.

The title, in and of itself, is a farce. “Earth’s Warmest Month on Record” How long has man been recording and compiling temperature around the globe? Twenty years? Thirty? In all reality, I doubt it’s been that long.

Trees are not an accurate measurement of temperature. Dendroclimatology is an evolving science in and of itself. The only accurate way of measuring temperature is by direct measurement using a device that measures temperature. All other methods are just estimations.

“All measurements are just estimations.”

So how do you explain that we are measuring global temperature to hundreds of a degree? And alarmists keep telling us each year is the warmest ever recorded?

Again, SO?

So speaks the arrogant intellectual elite who believes we are harming the earth with a faith akin to a child’s belief in Santa Claus. You Believers are so desperate to “matter”, but you are not only unimportant, you are destructive to man’s legitimate search for knowledge. Look up “Lysenkoism”. That is what you have done to government-funded science.

Liar, liar, pants on fire! Even the RAW data has been cooked, so to speak. For example, it isn’t following any scientific methodology to estimate an area’s temperature by arbitrarily assigning it the HIGHEST temperature from all of the closest weather station instruments. Likewise, if a given weather station quits, the temperature assigned is the highest of other stations nearest to its location. And how are the locations decided upon? Are they just placed close to the

You said, “When a station’s measurements do not meet data quality tests then it is
replaced by an interpolated value obtained from sites around it that are
adjusted to accommodate the average difference in readings from those
sites.” In other words, a guess, NOT a measurement! Why don’t you Believers just “interpolate” ALL your data?
http://www.climate-skeptic.com/temperature_measurement/

http://www.naturalnews.com/045695_global_warming_fabricated_data_scientific_fraud.html

Here is an interesting list of Climate myths that you probably believe in:

https://usnewsghost.wordpress.com/2014/04/01/ipcc-falsifying-climate-change-science-fraud-reports-exposed-co2-global-warming-recent/

Each of the methods have margins of error. How accurate is carbon dating?

Not really. It depends on a lot of variables which frequently we don’t know all about. For instance is tree growth a function of heat or moisture or both? And doesn’t that differ among the type of tree it is? It’s better than nothing, but when you have Mike ‘s nature trick thrown in it makes looking back about as reliable as the thermometers are with the adjustments GISS and the other make to their data.

I’m pretty sure the Chinese can’t give us the temperature in degrees F or C or K or anything else for that matter. Observations are good and they tell us about the MWP and the LIA, but the alarmists tell us they were local events and didn’t really happen worldwide. It screws up Mann’s hockey stick and make the little warming we’ve experience something that we should be saying so what about.

Since you treasure the Chinese view on Climate Change, you need to read about their Chinese Academy of Sciences publication, “Climate Change Reconsidered”. It refutes the IPCC findings. Bottom line: the Chinese do NOT believe in Global Warming!
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/6/prweb10824044.htm

They are. There are no denialist morons in the Chinese government.

Actually they dismiss man made climate change as an invention of Western liberal idiots

The global surface temperature record – as measured by thermometers, goes back to the early 1800’s.

The record as measured by nature goes back hundreds of thousands of years farther.

Most areas were the records were kept were cities. With the advent of sky scrapers and the automobile, during the winters city would go up a degree or 2 because of all the people opening doors. And these warm building would transfer some of their hear out.

LOL. Hundreds of thousands of years? Don’t you mean millions? Too bad that its written in a different language and we have to guess what the temperatures were.

For which period? Fool.

You keep swallowing. True stupidity. You not much different from a religious fanatic

From what consistent location, temperatures vary by elevation, time of day, clouds, urban vs rural, deforestatation, solar flares, el ninas, storm fronts, etc., etc.?

All I know is we have not flooded like all gore predicted we did, lol.

My favorite laugh was when the global truthers blamed bush for the hurricanes.

Can people really be that dumb?

Yep!

You are only partially correct. In 2006, he said Manhattan would be completely flooded in 15 years.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!

Well, according to Republican Retards who don’t have much connection to reality.

Are democrats. I finished that sentence for you.you are too stupid to live libitatd

He did you pig. Why are you swallowing propaganda like you swallow semen

Never underestimate the stupidity of people

In the matter of real science data is collected under very strict protocols… Even today the data being collected around the globe hardly follows that standard I.e, the hockeystick was/is Prue fabrication and scientific hogwash

I think only a dozen you would like to present..By the time of the second IPCC report in 1995 where for the first time CO2 forcing began to be proposed more prominently as a cause of serious alarm, the Medieval Warm Period was sidelined in the text and narrative. An important way that this was done in the report was to alter the diagram of recent climate history by simply shortening the time period it covered so that it now started after the Medieval Warm Period. All that was shown was the long slow recovery from the Little Ice Age to today’s temperatures, i.e. a long period of increasing temperatures. But clearly this was only a short term solution. The way that the Medieval Warm Period dominated the recent climate graph challenged the basic argument for CO2 forcing which was that the late 20th century climate was some how unique. As Jay Overpeck, an IPCC participant said in his email to Professor Deming, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period”.

So?

Berkeley Earth doesn’t adjust anything. Here are the results.

Note how closely Berkeley Earth matches the other temperature reconstructions.

So what, when you cook the data, to get the results you want it isn’t science.
It sure will be funny when all you lemmings wake up to the fact that the UN is just trying to get your money, and seize power from your National Government, and give your taxes to Ethiopia.
Here’s a counter argument to your link.
SCM_RC_2015_08_24_EN.pdf

So you contend that the meteorologists at the weather underground are part of the global conspiracy against you Denialist Retards?

Ahahahahahahahahahaha….

Are you also undecided on the matter of little microscopic dots causing disease?

It is pretty much the same level of Kookieness.

Once again, an anomaly. While attempting to justify human guilt for a global governing body, for BANKS and the political hacks.
How’s the Carbon extortion racket going? Hit the trillion mark yet today?

Oh, your not supposed to tell the useful idiots, wink, wink.
I got your back buddy, not another word!

No that would be Islam

More like the last 200 years.

This mont’s anomaly is so high that 2015 is already the warmest year the earth has seen in the last 120,000 years.

What??? Phrenology isn’t real???
Crap. There goes my doctoral dissertation.
Oh well. Guess it’s back to the journalism major.

Well, it’s done a remarkably good job so far.

October 2015: Earth’s Warmest Month on Record by a Huge Margin

http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/october-2015-earths-warmest-month-on-record-by-a-huge-margin

Of course NOAA is not using RSS. RSS isn’t taken seriously and it doesn’t measure surface temperatures.

At best, RSS measures the average temperature of the lower troposphere, at a median altitude of around 4 kilometers.

Have you ever been 4 Kilometers up? It’s cold up there.

Is that why the chief scientist at RSS systems (Satellite data), claims the surface temperature record is superior to the satellite record?

Ahahahahahahahahah

And when the cities are removed from the data set, the surface temperature record shows even more warming.

My goodness you are an ignorant loser.

Many of them tell stories of UFO cover ups and alien bases on the moon too.

A bargoon.

America spent 4 trillion to kill one man – Saddam – and create ISIS.

Now there was money wasted.

Not on point, you are losing, I asked about new nuclear?

Plus the alarmists can’t ‘adjust’ RSS numbers like they continually do to the other temperature records.

Is that why the chief scientist at RSS considers the surface temperature record to be more reliable than the satellite record?

Hahahahahahahahaha…. You pathetic loser.

In fact, the models confirm the observations that as the earth’s surface warms, the upper layers of the atmosphere cool.

So you are wrong yet again.

Pathetic.

I know of no falsified models. If you have falsified any then please write a paper and submit it to a peer reviewed journal.

All climate models that model the entire atmosphere.

You are quite the uneducated Retard.

You don’t seem to know the difference between weather and climate.

That makes you spectacularly ignorant.

Nice propaganda blog site.

Purchased by the Weather Channel. That just happens to have a political agenda. We call that agenda global warming.

actually some people do a decent job of forecasting the weather up to a year in advance with accuracy around 80%+…except they do it through observing solar activity and have enough integrity to admit when they don’t know something and don’t blow smoke up our asses that it’s caused by AGW

right. just like the so-called “law of gravity”. pure bunkum…

Your knowledge of science appears to be that of someone living 500 years ago.

I’m not at all surprised at your Republican ignorance.

Sir Isaac Newton: The
Universal Law of Gravitation

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/newtongrav.html

Do you deny that Newton formulated a universal law of gravitation?

My goodness you are stupid.

So It’s not a law when everyone says it is because you say it isn’t.

Sorry boy, but your kookie opinions are bring nothing but laughter to the floor.

Sorry boy, but Newtons Universal Law of gravitation was called a universal law of gravitation long centuries before Google existed.

My goodness you are ignorant.

“it was ultimately proven incorrect.”

Really? What has Newton’s universal law of gravitation been replaced with?

Do you have any evidence that Einsteinian laws of gravity are incomplete?

Nope.

And even if they were incomplete, they would still be laws. Just like the Newtonian law of Universal Gravitation.

Your article link ends with….

“So what’s the matter with gravity? It may or may not be related to dark energy and it doesn’t fit in with the other forces. If it’s not a particle or a wave, then what else it might be is unclear. “And that’s where it sits now,””

In other words nothing is wrong with gravity.

Kooooooooooooook.

It is PBS science pablum for the Scientifically illiterate American public.

It is a shame what Republicans have done to PBS. NOVA used to be very good. Now it is flashy, superficial, claptrap dumbed down for a sack of door knobs I.E. the American public.

The science of gravity has been settled since the time of Newton. What isn’t settled are some trivial details that don’t alter any of the real world predictions of Newton.

Similarly none of the conclusions of the science of Global Warming will be overturned by the few second and higher order details that are still not explained.

Only the truly ignorant presume that because something is not known, nothing is known.

And noone still has the slightest inkling of what it IS.
We know many of its attributes. We are able to predict planetary motion and ballistic trajectories with great certainty using the rules of Newton and Einstein.
But noone knows what gravity IS!
I really need to buy a new can of Troll-Be-Gone.

LOL. Not only stupid but looney as well.

Higher concentrations of vacuum energy = more space under the observation that vacuum energy has a constant local energy density as observed by an observer in that space.

It appears VD is still back in the 17th Century with his science.

Everybody who is jumping on Vedicar over the “law of gravitation” is wrong. A scientific law is not an explanation, it is an observation of some aspect of the universe. Things fall toward each other. That is a law, a law of gravity. Why they fall toward each other is left to someone to explain. Einstein explained gravity with his theories. Einstein’s ideas are not “laws”, they are theories. They try to explain a law. Newton stated a law of gravity but said he didn’t know what gravity was. Einstein explained how he thought it worked, but the law still stands. The problem is semantics. Even scientists sometimes use the term “law” and “theory” interchangeably and incorrectly.

Why lefites (they do seem to ask the same inane questions over and over again) comment that I must not believe in gravity, I always ask them which one? Newtons or Einsteins.?

Not even close. First of all if it is a law and you violate it, it isn’t a law anymore because you can’t violate.it. You don’t give us much to go on but so far your batting .000.

We are talking about gravity. Ding dong.

Fool.

“uncertainty, and this experience is of very great importance, I think. When a scientist doesn’t
know the answer to a problem, he is ignorant. When he has a hunch as to what
the result is, he is uncertain. And when he is pretty damn sure of what the
result is going to be, he is still in some doubt. We have found it of paramount
importance that in order to progress, we must recognize our ignorance and leave
room for doubt. Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees
of certainty — some most unsure, some nearly sure, but none absolutely certain.
Now, we scientists are used to this, and we take it for granted that it is
perfectly consistent to be unsure, that it is possible to live and not know.
But I don’t know whether everyone realizes this is true. Our freedom to doubt
was born out of a struggle against authority in the early days of science. It
was a very deep and strong struggle: permit us to question — to doubt — to not
be sure. I think that it is important that we do not forget this struggle and
thus perhaps lose what we have gained.”― Richard Feynman

The fascists in climate change are willing to throw away true science for 30 pieces of silver. Of course
the keep getting that silver year after year after year.

yeah. what was I thinking? there’s really no such scientific jargon as a “law” or “theory” or “hypothesis”. what’s your PhD in, bunky?

“Every post you makes..” yeah-if only I was as educated as you.

Which hockey stick? There are now at least two dozen of them.

What about the other two dozen of them?

Nice example for this December https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/instant-noaa-forecast-fail/

here you go: “A key difference between meteorologists and climatologists lies in the time perspectives they bring to the study of weather and climate. Meteorologists produce forecasts that are intended to predict weather conditions over the short term, often a horizon no longer than 7 to 10 days. Climatologists, meanwhile, employ a long-term perspective, developing and analyzing models that are designed to predict changes in weather patterns in the months and years to come. A meteorologist will predict whether it will rain in the next day or two, but a climatologist will predict whether climate patterns will result in more rainfall on average in the years to come.” http://work.chron.com/climatologist-vs-meteorologist-16462.html

Clearly not.

Why do you feel a need to childishly lie about such things?

Are you mentally ill?

You poor boy. You think you can hide the fact that 2015 is the hottest year in the last 120,000 years.

You clearly are mentally ill.

That was the warmest year in the U.S. PopTart. Not the warmest year globally.

The U.S. only comprises about 2% of the earths surface.

You are clearly ignorant.

Given that 98% of the worlds scientists support the view that the anthropomorphic emission of CO2 is causing the globe to warm, it would appear tat your claim is a mathematically impossible lie.

Do you intend to remain a liar for the rest of your life?

“Well, you global warmist clown, the hottest temperature ever record in Djibouti was 151 degrees in 2003.” – Kook

You aren’t one of those kooks that try to claim that all of the worlds surface will rise at a uniform rate everywhere in the world are you?

That would be spectacularly stupid for anyone to do, wouldn’t it?

As a bunkologist, I debunk theories in years to come. AGW will be thrown on the dustbin of history just like the ice age warnings of the 1970s. By then, the AGW crowd will have moved on to some other scheme to reallocate taxpayers’ money.

Too bad you can’t smell what you are shoveling.

Yup, 120,000 years

Mann’s hockey stick now has a couple dozen cousins.

That makes me laugh, and makes you Denialists crap your diapers.

Really? Where is real data not NOAA/GISS adjusted,massaged and corrected temperatures.

All of which have undergone serious adjustments lowering past temperatures and raising recent temperatures.In 2007 NASA/GISS published a list of the ten warmest years and 4 of the top ten occurred before 1940. 1934 was the warmest followed by 1921. After the massaging and adjustment none of the pre-1940 years were in the top ten.You might recall that NASA reported wrong temperature data for 2000-2006,higher of course,until caught out by Mr McIntyre.
Still asking for the real data for the 120,000 years.

And then there is more recent NASA/GISS tampering with temperature data.

http://notrickszone.com/2012/03/01/data-tamperin-giss-caught-red-handed-manipulaing-data-to-produce-arctic-climate-history-revision/

Another NASA (Hansen) adjustment, this time the whole country of Iceland was secretly warmed up.

http://newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=5070

Icelandic officials rejected the “adjusted” warmer temperatures out of hand.http://moyhu.blogspot.com/2012…
Apparently NASA didn’t restrict its tampering to the US.

He who laughs last laughs best.

So “measurement times have become standard.” means all temperatures prior to the 1990s were cooled and all temperatures after 1998 were warmed up. A statistical impossibility. By the way all these revisions were made by government employees aided and abetted by government funded academics and it is known the he who pays the piper calls the tune. Time to sign off as you can lead a
AGW fanatics to the truth and facts but you can’t make them think for themselves.

you’re probably right. just like acid rain or ozone. oh wait-those “predictions” turned out to be correct. darn!

Oh. It is because averages capture the evolution of a system more precisely than the moment to moment noise in the system.

That is why the concept of an averaging was invented.

Your education is clearly lacking.

Stochastic phenomenon are not stochastic over all intervals. That is why averaging was invented.

If the weather was stochastic over all intervals then there would be no distinction between winter and summer, and no statistical difference between fall and summer.

Yet there are such differences which indicates that there is an underlying pattern to the noise.

And that is why averaging is applicable.

easy–entirely different analysis; different tools. next question.

Sorry deadbeat, but there was no warning from the scientific community of an imminent ice age back in the 1960’s.

In fact it has been known for almost 150 years that adding CO2 to the atmosphere would warm the planet.

A crude but still accurate back of the envelope calculation was done back then by Lord Kelvin who showed a 2 to 3 ‘C warming could be expected.

My goodness you are ignorant.

I’m needed everywhere.

Sorry deadbeat, but there was no warning from the scientific community of an imminent ice age back in the 1960’s.

In fact it has been known for almost 150 years that adding CO2 to the atmosphere would warm the planet.

A crude but still accurate back of the envelope calculation was done back then by Lord Kelvin who showed a 2 to 3 ‘C warming could be expected.

My goodness you are ignorant.

You got me wrong. I don’t hate to the degree and throw a temper tantrum like VendicarDecarian0 if I don’t get the answer I want or somebody doesn’t post the way I want them to post on any of these sites. According to you, you’re on the side of science and in my own mind I’m on the side of science. I just don’t believe it’s settled science which I believe is coming from your camp. However, I will watch your link with an open mind.

Weather prediction involves the time evolution of the atmosphere on a minute by minute basis for periods as long as a week or two.

Climate prediction involved the time evolution of average weather over periods of 30 years or more.

if you don’t know the difference then you are too ignorant to be commenting on either.

Both are predictions based on models that are derived from empirical data. So if you can’t get a weather forecast right, it calls into question your ability to accurately model the global climate. If your models can’t make accurate predictions, quit publicly announcing predictions until you can make accurate predictions. See how that works? Glad I could help.

I understand the difference between global and local phenomenon. Unlike you, I have formal education in the sciences. However, that does negate the fact that a “scientific” organization loses credibility when the continues to make inaccurate forecasts based on flawed models.

Your formal scientific education must be in janitorial science.

No one is making climate forecasts.

There goes your claim to be educated. Right out the window….

Hey, can you post a photo of your woman and her phone number? I bet she would appreciate a real man. Don’t worry, I will give her back later.

Yeah, I figured that was probably the case but I didn’t want to “discriminate.” His woman is probably Kaitlin-like.

Real men accept reality. Republican cowards lie to themselves to avoid thinking about it.

Besides, your dick is too small.

And you are one of those suckers, Poptart.

You are clearly mentally ill, Poptart.

Insane tittering are all the Denialist losers have left.

Threats? I have seen no threats.

But there will be punishment for treason against man and nature.

Many of you losers will be hung in the streets.

Tic.. Tok, every second that passes brings those public hangings closer.

Some will just be horse whipped.

How long have you been an enemy of science, momma’s boy?

Has it been since you flunked out of public school?

sure do. and as a matter of fact, if you check with a meteorologist, you’ll discovery that predictions/forecasts of upcoming local weather events are generally accurate-over 90% of the time, if you’re referring to 1-3 day forecasts. Obviously, the farther out you get, the less accuracy you get. But that applies to what most folks refer to as weather forecasts. Climatology is an entirely different area. But of course you knew that….

Really? Can you name three?

None of which are massive failures in science.

Try again to name three.

Deibold let me vote for Obama 12 times. Oh.. Wait….

You mean like the VooDoo economic failure that was Ronald Reagan?

No?

naw. if you’re referring to what most folks refer to as weather forecasts, for 1-3 days the accuracy is over 90%. The longer range forecasts are less accurate. But that’s as to the science of localized weather forecasting. Climatology is an entirely different animal, with different tools, analysis, etc. since it’s not about whether it’s going to rain in Chicago on Wednesday.

no doubt you are right. really no such thing a meteorology, or climatology. just a bunch of frauds engaged in a global, grand conspiracy that only highly educated folks like yourself can discern. got it.

“water prefiction”–well I have to admit-you got me on that one.

you’re probably right. in fact, come to think of it, I’ve been duped to believe in such nonsense as the laws of physics; the theory of relativity; and the theory of evolution. what the heck was I thinking?

Guess you don’t understand law…

No worried idiot I know a good lawyer who can get the penalties reduced!

(1) A person commits criminal impersonation if he knowingly assumes a false or fictitious identity or capacity, and in such identity or capacity he: (d) Does an act which if done by the person falsely impersonated, might subject such person to an action or special proceeding, civil or criminal, or to liability, charge, forfeiture, or penalty; or (e) Does any other act with intent to unlawfully gain a benefit for himself or another or to injure or defraud another.

Good luck in court defending it kid!!!